IMPLICATIONS AND LINGUISTIC ASPECTS IN THE WRITING OF AN APHASIC SUBJECT

Abstract

ABSTRACT
At first, the study about pathologies of language has been linked to an anatomic- physiologic dysfunction of the brain. However, with the change of the paradigm of the nineteenth century, the brain begins to be studied in a scientific manner to unravel the relationship between brain and language. The description of language disorders resulting from injured-brain man gave rise to aphasia. In the other hand, Neuro, modern field in aphasia studies took place in the studies of linguistic and cognitive processes in normal and pathological brain that conceives language a place of interaction and dialogue of subjects. Traditionally, the written language is not addressed in a meaningful way in studies of aphasia , this justifies our choice to engage in a discussion of the process of written language (re)construction and the strategies used by RR to circumvent his difficulties , and for that we start from three key points : 1 ) the consideration of the importance of literacy processes of the subject, 2 ) consideration of the interaction conditions that occur and 3) how the activities during the Ecoa2 interfere with the process in the (re)construction of language. In this dissertation, we present some concepts involved in comprehension written language status in studies related to the Neuro, as the studies developed by Luria and Vygotsky. We choose some categories of analysis for the data that sought to embrace the hypothesis that the conditions of literacy and inclusion in reading and writing practices collaborate for the re-entry of the subject RR in the writing world. From the perspective of these concepts, the aim of this study is to analyze the effect of social practices with the language in the (re)construction of the subject of writing RR. The elucidation of the survey was conducted through qualitative data of the written productions of RR, taken from the group meetings and individual , and put the subject in different situations and dialogic reading and writing practices . The collective monitoring group is held at the aphasic and non aphasic living space (ECOA). The longitudinal monitoring and analysis turn to studies of linguistics allies to the Neuro studies. We identified as the monitoring was crucial to the evolution and to rehabilitate RR for practices with language. Thus, we seek to contribute to the theoretical development about the functioning of the language in the pathology.